Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post Ronald Hilton on Churchill
Created by John Eipper on 04/01/15 8:34 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:


Ronald Hilton on Churchill (David Pike, -France, 04/01/15 8:34 am)

A couple of days ago, John E reprinted a Ronald Hilton post on the subject of Churchill. I somehow missed the posting back in 2003, but it's not too late to comment on a few points, with all due respect to the dear professor who changed my life.

Churchill, he wrote, lost the 1945 election because he was seen as "not the man to organize the peace." But RH was not then in the UK. I myself had a clear impression that the vote had nothing to do with foreign policy. The vote against him came from the millions, many of them returning troops, who hungered for radical social change and were dead set against a return to the domestic policies of the conservative governments of the 1920s and '30s.

RH again: "Was there ever a statesman who spent more time in the bath?" I would say, Napoleon.

RH: "He was offered the Order of the Garter." Yes. And in 1945 he refused it, and even more so a title of nobility that would automatically exclude him from the Commons. He would remain as Mr Churchill, "a child of the House," and leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition. It was only in 1953, just before the Coronation, that Churchill accepted the offer, receiving from the young Queen the Order and the knighthood that went with it. In doing so he faced the criticism of his greatest supporter, the Canadian Lord Beaverbrook. And here a word on Beaverbrook. His press empire was strongly conservative, but when Churchill returned to power in 1951 Beaverbrook's newspapers criticized the conservative government on all kinds of points... but never Churchill personally. That bond had been forged in the Battle of Britain, when Beaverbrook had been chosen by Churchill to head a new ministry, that of Aircraft Production. Dowding, head of RAF Fighter Command, later said that he "could not have held, far less prevailed, without the help of that mercurial man."

All the same, in 1953, at the time that Churchill accepted the knighthood, Beaverbrook expressed his regret. It was a pity, he said, that the man known to the world as Mr Churchill, in its grand simplicity, would now be known under a different title.

JE comments:  Prof. H. is happy to be rejoining our conversations; I'm certain of it.

Here's the original 2003 post.  My thanks to Paul Pitlick for bringing it to our attention:


Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 0


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (46745 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who