Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Marta Andreasen; Neil and Christine Hamilton
Created by John Eipper on 03/03/13 3:26 PM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Marta Andreasen; Neil and Christine Hamilton (John Heelan, -UK, 03/03/13 3:26 pm)

Nigel Jones regards Marta Andreassen as a "flake" (3 March). He might be correct in his estimation, as I do not know the background. Nigel was also correct when he said (2 March) that UKIP would not exist without Nigel Farage. This is true because Farage, as he boasted to the Foreign Press Association (24 May 2009), promoted UKIP's "get UK out of Europe" message while receiving £2 million in expenses as an MEP in Brussels. (One has to admire his chutzpah!)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/24/mps-expenses-ukip-nigel-farage

However I would be interested in Nigel's views on the faintly comedic husband/wife team--the Hamiltons--that has been promoting UKIP, not only in Eastleigh but also on a flagship BBC current affairs programme. Neil Hamilton was implicated as a Conservative MP and Minister in the 1994 "Cash for Questions" scandal in the House of Commons. A parliamentary report (the Downey Report) cleared Hamilton of taking bribes, but it did find "compelling evidence" of his receiving cash and benefits as well as misleading the President of the Board of Trade. Appeals to the Courts eventually led to his bankruptcy and resignation from active politics (then).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Hamilton_%28politician%29#.22Cash-for-questions.22

Subsequently, the Hamiltons appeared on sundry "celebrity" television shows and in pantomime. The formidable distaff side of the partnership, Christine, even appeared in a jungle-based reality TV programme in which she and the other "competitors" were asked to perform gruesome tasks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_Hamilton

While the pair are obviously adept at self-promotion, one wonders at UKIP's PR strategy in welcoming such potential "flakes" to represent its policies. Perhaps it is another example of Farage's chutzpah?

JE comments:  Farage claimed that the £2 million in expenses were used to promote the UKIP political agenda at home.  That is an awful lot of money for travel and office supplies, although Farage is probably unapologetic about accepting EU largesse to undermine it from within.



SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 7

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (44621 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who