Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post Advice for Republicans: *WSJ*
Created by John Eipper on 11/14/12 2:00 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:


Advice for Republicans: *WSJ* (Richard Hancock, USA, 11/14/12 2:00 am)

Bret Stevens of the November 12 Wall Street Journal says that the Republicans were lucky that they didn't win. "The GOP dodged ownership of the second great recession which will inevitably hit when the Federal Reserve can no longer float the economy in pools of free money. When that happens, Barack Obama won't have George W. Bush to kick around."

He advises the Republicans to change their attitude on the following:

1. Opposition to gays (people should be free to live however they want as long as they don't bother others).

2. Abortion (he cites President Clinton in his statement that he wanted abortion to be "safe, legal and rare." The Republicans need a truce on social issues).

3. Immigration ("What's so awful about Spanish. It's a fine European language with a great literary tradition. Bilingualism is an intellectual virtue, not a deviant sexual practice. If the argument is that these immigrants 'steal jobs,' then that's an argument by someone who either doesn't understand the free market or aspires for his children to become busboys and chambermaids.")

4. At least 5 bad candidates caused the GOP not to win the Senate. (Can we, as the GOP base, demand an IQ exam from our congressional and presidential candidates?)

Stevens concludes: "So get a grip Republicans: our republican experiment in self-government didn't die last week. But a useful message has been sent to the party that spent too much of the past four years listening intently to itself. Change the channel for a little while."

Richard Hancock says: I hope the members of the Tea Party will read this piece.

JE comments: If the GOP hierarchy changes its tune on social issues (gays, abortion and immigration being the Big Three), the 2012 election will have been one of those paradigm shifting events in US politics, rather like the South becoming Republican in the 1960s, and the birth of the Reagan Democrats in 1980.  But where would the fundamentalist hardliners then turn?  One can't rule out a third party coming into existence, along the lines of the present Tea Party.  It might do very well in some states.

Put more succinctly, are the libertarian and the social conservative/"theocratic" brands of Republicanism due for a split?  Perhaps not:  if history is our guide, 2014 will prove beneficial for the GOP even if it changes nothing.

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 0


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (46745 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who