Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Milosevich's Plans and NATO
Created by Ronald Hilton on 05/10/99 3:16 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Milosevich's Plans and NATO (Ronald Hilton, USA, 05/10/99 3:16 am)

Tom Moore of Hoover expresses the strong feelings of many WAISers. He does not condone Milosevich but he blames Clinton for the "mess". He says:
     The problem is what do we do with the mess we are now in. Neither the Chinese nor the Russians will support NATO being at the core of any force that occupies Kosovo, even if we got Milosevich to agree to such a force.
     "Let´s not forget that Milosevich started it all, just as Hitler did." I disagree. We presented the Serbs with an ultimatum. They had to allow Kosovo to become independent in three years and allow NATO to occupy all of Serbia.
     We have demonized Milosevich. He clearly is a war criminal for having fostered the Bosnia war. What he was doing in Kosovo before the bombing was largely going after the KLA, which was described by our State Department as a terrorist organization and is certainly not different from the Kurdish guerillas or the Basques. Although there were atrocities before the bombing, they were investigated by the International observers. There was no systematic effort to expel the Kosovars. Even now it is not clear whether it is Milosevich who is trying to expel the Kosovars or irregulars and neighbors who covet their land and property.
     If we did get Clinton's wish and have NATO occupy Kosovo we would have to have extensive troops there to protect the Serb residents from the anger of the Kosovars and to protect the Kosovars from their neighbors as well. We would have to be there for decades.
     Our best solution is to stop dropping bombs on people, take up Milosevich's offer of allowing an UN force without NATO in and let the UN try and police the province. I agree that many if not most of the refugees will not be willing to go back in but I am not sure that they will go back in any case unless all of the Serbs are ethnically cleansed and Kosovo is independent.
     No matter what we will face a horrendous bill for rebuilding Serbia and Kosovo."
     My comment: We do not yet know exactly neither what took place before the military action began nor the plans of Milosevich. My reading is that he planned to clear the Kosovars out.
     NATO´s demand that he accept a free vote after three years makes sense. We should have learned from Northern Ireland that this is the only way to solve such problems, although Lincoln instilled in Americans the idea of fighting to preserve the union, which was the idea of George III, who lost. Lincoln won.


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 2

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (44445 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who