Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post Deep State and Hidden Bureaucracies: Bagehot, Glennon
Created by John Eipper on 09/23/21 9:12 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:


Deep State and Hidden Bureaucracies: Bagehot, Glennon (David A. Westbrook, USA, 09/23/21 9:12 am)

With regard to the Deep State discussion, one might also mention the 19th-century political economist (and editor of the Economist) Walter Bagehot, who wrote of the development of a hidden bureaucratic apparatus for doing the actual business of government that was (re)presented by the more visible organs, such as Parliament.

One should be careful, though. I think it is too "loose" to equate the idea of the Deep State with elites writ large--you lose all analytic rigor. Even confining the concept to government, ordinarily understood, the idea is ancient. Surely Machiavelli was comfortable with the idea that the visible/obscured parts of government are in tension with one another. Governments, and especially militaries, have always required administration, coordination, counting, taxes, and so forth. The first thing William the Conqueror did was have everything in England counted.

The idea that even our putatively enlightened, democratic, transparent, etc., government really is not what it appears to be was updated, with regard to US security and the Forever War in particular, by Michael Glennon, in "National Security and Double Government." I posted an appreciative review on WAIS way back in 2014 (wow).


That was during the Obama administration. Rereading today, and with Clinton/Trump in mind, I was struck by this:

"Instead, Glennon shows how bureaucracy constrains and ultimately vitiates democratic possibility. In doing so, the security state not only disenfranchises, but discourages, 'Joe Sixpack.' We watch football, and elections as football, but we cease to be democratic actors--we the people are not overthrown, but dissolved, and each make our separate ways....

"At some point, democracy is dependent on the virtues of the people, the demos. And maybe this nation of so many millions is losing its capacity to instill civic virtue--which is after all a paternalistic, and in that sense illiberal, task--in a sufficient number of its people to produce 'a people' capable of self-governance.

"Glennon, in short, is discussing how the American project may end."

JE comments:  Bert, I re-read your post from seven years ago, and it reads more true now than then.  Glennon stresses that it's not the case of the elite lording over the ignorant masses for their own good (Frederick the Great?), but an elite that is entangled in its own web of ambitions and rivalries.  All this begs the (unanswerable?) question:  what is to be done?  Glennon described the conditions for the rise of Trumpism, but more so he explained why Hillary Clinton would not prevail.  Trump's "draining the swamp" was one solution, albeit an incoherent and ultimately failed one.

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 220


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (44344 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who