Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Why Did the Supreme Court Not Side with Trump?
Created by John Eipper on 12/22/20 11:05 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Why Did the Supreme Court Not Side with Trump? (Tor Guimaraes, USA, 12/22/20 11:05 am)

First I must congratulate Arturo Ezquerro (December 19th) for his excellent post regarding the stupidity of Brexit. In an age when the world is shrinking, cooperation, unification, participation should be the key words for humanity to survive, let alone prosper. Only special interests drive nationalism, fundamentalism, and xenophobia. The EU is far from perfect, but it is a grand experiment which should not be allowed to fail.

JE commented on my last post (regarding US vs Chinese democracies), "Trump resolutely failed in his quest to be president-for-life, and ... the US courts, even Trump's own judicial appointees, rejected the seas of litigation to overturn the election results. Do you really believe an analogous process could have happened in China?"

Presently, there is zero chance; further, the present Chinese top leader can stay on with the party's consent. Surely does not seem very democratic, eh?

On the other hand, our precious US courts can be blamed over the years for blindness to a wide array of injustices ranging from vote suppression, racial injustices, civil rights violations, to enabling a wide variety of electoral process manipulation by special interests. To my relief, even this Trump Supreme Court, no matter how biased, is apparently not debased enough to allow an election overturn by claimants with no evidence to back charges of fraud against election officials of their own party. While they were not crazy enough for Trump this time around, four more years of indoctrination could be sufficient in the future, just like the Nazi judiciary.

Nevertheless, if a democratic system can ensure that the government represents the people's interests, then the political leaders would stop trying to manipulate the courts as a vehicle to accomplish their special interests. We must not forget that the elected legislative must write the laws to be executed/interpreted by the other branches.

JE comments:  I am reminded of Cameron Sawyer's reassurances that the court system is beholden to no one, politically.  Most of us took this argument with a grain of salt, but so far since November 3rd, the Supreme Court (and lower courts) are proving us skeptics wrong.


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 173

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (44444 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who