Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Federal Reserve Loans to Foreign Banks
Created by John Eipper on 06/11/16 10:12 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Federal Reserve Loans to Foreign Banks (Massoud Malek, USA, 06/11/16 10:12 am)

Is Donald Trump less presidential than George W. Bush, who caused the 2008 financial crisis that cost the US economy more than $22 trillion?

According to CNN, when counting both "removals" and "returns," 12.3 million undocumented immigrants were forced to leave the country under Bill Clinton. Would Trump's administration deport more immigrants than Bill Clinton?

In 2008, the GDP of the United States was $14.72 trillion and the entire national debt of the United States government spanning its 200+ year history was $14.12 trillion.

On July 21, 2011, the results of the first audit in the Federal Reserve's nearly 100-year history were posted on Senator Bernie Sander's webpage. The audit uncovered that US provided a whopping $16 trillion in secret loans to bail out American and foreign banks and businesses during the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

The Federal Reserve donated $2.5 trillion to Citigroup, while Morgan Stanley received $2.04 trillion. Goldman Sachs received "only" $814 billion. "A clear case of socialism for the rich and you're-on-your-own individualism for everyone else," as Sanders wrote four years before jumping into the 2016 presidential campaign.

In 2011, Sanders wrote: "No agency of the United States government should be allowed to bail out a foreign bank or corporation without the direct approval of Congress and the president."

Unilaterally, the Federal Reserve provided trillions of dollars in financial assistance to foreign banks and corporations from South Korea to Scotland. The Royal Bank of Scotland and the Deutsche Bank split about a trillion and numerous other banks received hefty chunks of the $16 trillion. Virtually none of the money has been returned, and it was loaned out at 0% interest.

Would Hillary Clinton, a staunch defender of Israel, be more merciful to Palestinians than Benjamin Netanyahu, who is planing to surround all of Israel with a wall to protect it from Palestinians and the citizens of surrounding Arab states, whom he described as "wild beasts?"

In 2004, the majority of Americans decided to re-elect a man who lied and caused the death of thousands of Iraqis. In 2016, the overwhelming majority of Americans prefer to choose between two liars as our Commander-in-Chief; a racist man and a fraudulent woman. One would build a wall to stop rapists, the other would cheer the construction of a wall to keep wild beasts out.

Sources:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/15/politics/republican-debate-factcheck/

http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/the-fed-audit

https://www.sott.net/article/250592-Audit-of-the-Federal-Reserve-Reveals-16-Trillion-in-Secret-Bailouts

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/10/netanyahu-plans-fence-around-israel-to-protect-it-from-wild-beasts

JE comments:  So Massoud, between Hillary and (The) Donald, who is the lesser of the two evils?


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 152

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

  • "Looking Presidential"...and Potential VP Picks? (Robert Whealey, USA 06/11/16 1:25 PM)
    Which candidate "looks presidential" (Massoud Malek, 10 June) is crude propaganda. Forget Trump. G W Bush, as these statistics show, ran up a huge deficits and national debt. He wasted the taxpayers' money in unwinnable wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan and Syria. Bush 43 was the worst president of the US. Obama's problem is that he did not have the power to expose Bush 43's record.

    Candidate Trump may not get the nomination in Cleveland. He does not seem to be able to write a memo to the State Department, DOD, TD, or the Fed. Hillary, Sanders, Sen. E. Warren, and Biden seem to be uniting in Philadelphia.


    JE comments: Is there any plausible scenario that will deny the Republican nomination to Trump?  Beyond deus ex machina, I can think of none.


    Also, after Hillary's primary victory in California, it's time to play the quadrennial WAIS game, "Guess the VP." This time there are two parties in the running.


    Who in WAISworld will send the first entry? My first thought for Trump would be that handsome Marco Rubio, but he has said he will not accept.  Hillary's "obvious" choice would be Bernie Sanders, who has not categorically ruled out accepting, if offered.


    Sarah Palin is rested up...Donald?


    Please login/register to reply or comment:


Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (44444 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who