Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Recent US Foreign Policy
Created by John Eipper on 09/23/12 2:12 PM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Recent US Foreign Policy (Tor Guimaraes, USA, 09/23/12 2:12 pm)

Reading Randy Black's 23 September posting, loaded with one-sided criticism of the Obama administration's foreign activities, reminded me that the seeds for failure in that region were planted decades ago. On 15 June 2008 I wrote, "If we are talking about massive conflicts of one civilization clashing against another, such as the Cold War, African slavery, the crusades, etc., then the present Judeo/Christian versus Islam conflict is as big as the Cold War and much bigger than the present WAIS postings are reflecting. The essentially Israeli agents who for the last several years have guided American Middle East foreign policy have been too narrow-minded strategically. By hoping for an easy victory against the nasty Iraqi dictator instead of an obviously justified but more drawn-out attack on Al Qaeda, they made a huge mistake. The hoped-for Judeo/Christian clash against Islamic fundamentalism hell bent on destroying Israel and its allies is turning instead into a clash with broader Islam. Anyone with at least three neurons left knows that we will lose such a clash for two very basic reasons: 1. The Islamic camp can bleed us to death by just playing good/bad cop just as Mubarak, Musharraf, etc. have been doing by helping the US fight Al Qaeda. 2. Islamic countries have long standing cooperation with a redefined third world: Russia, China, etc., which represent an increasingly important strategic component in the Judeo/Christian versus Islam clash of civilizations."

Some of the major actors have changed, but the theme and story plot remains basically the same. Our motivation to control the region through political manipulation, military action and assistance (to protect corporate oil and arms manufacturers' interests, and Israel), seems to be expensive, ineffective, and even counterproductive. Now instead of a relatively stable Egypt, Pakistan, Libya, and Syria, we have wild hornet nests throughout the region. The only apparent good news is that now we are mostly out of Iraq, even though Iran seems to be sharing the benefits from that. Last, as planned by the late Osama Bin Laden, our enemies in the region now can rest easier knowing that we are financially broke and tired of wars to "build" someone else's countries. Even Obama's sneaky drone attacks seems to produce more strategic harm than good results. Perhaps it is time to change long-standing policy to something else more productive in the long run.

JE comments: Here's the link to Tor Guimaraes's post cited above (15 June 2008):

http://waisworld.org/go.jsp?id=02a4&objectType=post&o=21715&objectTypeId=15965&topicId=1


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (1)
93%
Informational value100%
Insight100%
Fairness80%

Visits: 13

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

  • US Use of Drones and UAVs (Bienvenido Macario, USA 09/24/12 8:47 AM)
    Tor Guimaraes wrote on 23 September:

    "Obama's sneaky drone attacks seems to produce more strategic harm than good results. Perhaps it is time to change long-standing policy to something else more productive in the long run."



    The UAV/Drone program was in service even before Obama was elected president, and the significant opposition to the use of drones comes from the Taliban. I don't know if Afghanistan's President Karzai is against the use of drones. With regards to foreign policy, I think the Obama administration doesn't see the need to change the policy. Perhaps through the US Congress committee on foreign relations, changes could be effected.


    JE comments: David A. Westbrook has written at length about America's reliance on drone warfare, with the conclusion that its strategic liabilities overshadow any tactical benefit. But (domestic) politics overshadow strategy:  for the US public, drones are an expedient way to engage the enemy with no risk to ourselves. 


    In a more innocent age, video games were based on war.  Now it's the other way around.  I hope General Sullivan and General DeLong will join this conversation.


    Isn't Pakistan, to cite one example, an ardent critic of the US drone policy?




    Please login/register to reply or comment:


Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (44445 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who