Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post re: "Wrong Side of History," Marx and Hans Fallada (Alain de Benoist, France)
Created by John Eipper on 07/14/10 4:52 AM - re-wrong-side-of-history-marx-and-hans-fallada-alain-de-benoist-france

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

re: "Wrong Side of History," Marx and Hans Fallada (Alain de Benoist, France) (John Eipper, USA, 07/14/10 4:52 am)

Alain de Benoist writes:

I would like to thank the WAISers who sent responses and comments to my 10 July post: Jordi Molins i Coronado, David Gress, Ernie Hunt, Nigel Jones, and Sardar Haddad.

Jordi wrote (11 July): 'Even though I am biased against Communism, I can see something good about it: the original idea of 'everybody is equal'.'

As the 'goodness' of this proposition is not obvious, Jordi should explain why he thinks that the idea that 'everybody is equal' is good. He could also specify in which sense he understands 'equal.' In the sense of sameness? Otherwise? What I found the most strange is that he sees Communism as fundamentally related to 'equality.' Personally, I would have rather thought about the US motto: 'All men are born free and equal' (a obvious double mistake--or is it a double lie?). To fight against income and social inequalities certainly does not means or implies that 'everybody is equal.' Against some earlier utopian socialists of the 18th and 19th centuries, like Gracchus Babeuf (the 'République des égaux'), Karl Marx fought against social injustice and class oppression, but never appealed to the idea of 'equal rights' to legitimate his struggle. Nor did he structure either his vision of the future society around the notion of 'equality.' To the contrary, he strongly criticizes Gotha's Program for having said that work's benefits must be distributed 'to all members of the society with an equal right' (Marx and Engels, Selected Works, New York: 1968, International Publishers, p. 319).

That Marx has never been a defender of 'equality' has been luminously demonstrated by Alan Wood in his seminal article 'Marx and Equality,' in John Mepham and David Hillel Rubin (eds), Issues of Marxist Philosophy, vol. 4, Brighton: 1981, Harvester Press (reprinted in John Roemer, ed., Analytical Marxism, Cambridge: 1986, Cambridge University Press, pp. 283-303).

Introducing his very well articulated post of 11 July, David Gress wrote: 'For decades I have wondered about two things. Is there a direction to history? And, regardless of direction, is there a right or a wrong side to it? Frank Fukuyama famously in 1989 said yes to both questions [â¦] He of course relied via Kojève on Hegel, who perceived a reason in history [â¦] My studies persuade me that Hegel, Alexandre Kojève and Fukuyama have a point, but that there is also a wide gap between philosophical reasoning and social reality.'

As for myself, I do not believe there is any general direction to history, in which the whole mankind would be implied. History is not written by advance. In that sense, history is always open and unpredictable, because man himself is unpredictable. But there are historical cycles, and local historical developments of great length ('de longue durée') whose dynamics cannot be overturned before the end of their own cycle. It is clear, for instance, that Western dynamics since two millenia has been carried on by some principles which were first formulated as theological and religious principles, then became secular and ideological, or even 'scientifical' (notions like 'progress' or 'reason', for example), and that the logic inherent to these principles has never been stopped. Such principles will be exhausted only after having produced all they were intrinsically able to produce.

Ernie Hunt (11 July) summarized his belief with these words: 'The Christian viewpoint changed the ancient view of history. We are not going in circles. We are not Sisyphus. We are going somewhere [â¦] to the mysterious fulfillment of God's ultimate promises.'

Ernie is quite right to say that Christianity 'changed the ancient view of history.' It did it by replacing a cyclical (or 'spherical,' if we use Nietzsche's words) conception of history by a vectorial-linear-unitarian view where history has an absolute beginning, a absolute ending, and leads the whole mankind 'somewhere.' This is the root of the notion of 'progress.' Unfortunately, history does not obey beliefs. Mankind is only made of cultures, and cultures have their own history. Cultures are born, they grow, they mature and they die. What the Western world lives today has already been lived at the end of the Roman Empire. For Oswald Spengler, the moment where a culture becomes a civilization marks the beginning of its decay.

To contradict my opinion that 'there is no wrong or right side of history,' Sardar Haddad (11 July) just repeats that we see in history bad people (Stalin, Hitler, Mao, etc.) and nice people (he quotes Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Jr., Gandhi). This shows he did not really understand what I meant. That some historical figures are better or worse than others is obvious. However, it is not the proof that there is a 'wrong' or a 'right' side of history. That there is a 'right' and a 'wrong' side of history is a proposition that can be sustained only philosophically, and only if one sticks to a teleogical view of history. That's why I quoted the name of Hegel. I do not know on which philosophy of history Sardar relies. My philosophy of history relies mainly on Herder, Vico, and Spengler.

Another difficulty Sardar should not underestimate is that to determine where is the 'right' (or the 'wrong') side of history is not so easy, because no consensus will ever be established on the criteria of judgment. The dictators we regard today as extremely bad were acclaimed by millions of peoples in their times. Even today, Lincoln, Martin Luther King., Jr., and Gandhi are certainly not recognized by everybody as having been on the 'right' side of history. More generally, that kind of division does not work for most historical peoples and situations. A simple question to Sardar: at the time of the war between the Armagnacs and the Bourguignons, which side was the 'right' one? Finally, let's not forget that the very definition of the 'right' or 'wrong' side of history is usually given by the winners.

(Short note. Sardar wrote: 'Alain has expressed a negative view of freedom and democracy in the US. Does he also have a negative view of freedom and democracy in France?' My answer: yes, of course.)

I was pleased to see Nigel Jones (12 Kuly) quoting the name of Hans Fallada (actually it was a pen-name, taken from the Brothers Grimm tales. His real name was Rudolf Ditzen). I have read most of Fallada's books. Though his Kleiner Mann, was nun? (Little Man, What Now?) is the best known of his works, I think the most interesting one is Bauern, Bonzen und Bomben (1931), a powerful evocation of the great revolt of the Landbewegung, the movement of the Schleswig-Holstein peasants under the Republic of Weimar (Ernst von Salomon wrote about the same topic, with Die Stadt).

Hans Fallada wrote about the anti-Hitlerian Resistance after WWII (his Jeder stirbt für sich allein was published in 1947, a few months after his death), but he was never personally involved in this movement. Under the Third Reich, he lived in Carwitz (Mecklenburg) and was at that time particularly prolific, with books like Wir hatten mal ein Kind (1934), Wer einmal aus dem Blechnapf friÃt? (1934), Märchen vom Stadtschreiber, der aufs Land flog (1935), Altes Herz geht auf die Reise (1936, a book translated into French during the Nazi occupation, in 1941, with a foreword of Alphonse de Châteaubriant), Hoppelpoppel --wo bist du? (1936), Wolf unter Wölfen (1937), Der eiserne Gustav (1938), SüÃmilch spricht (1939), Der ungeliebte Mann (1940), Das Abenteuer des Werner Quabs (1941), Damals bei uns daheim (1942), Heute bei uns zu Haus (1943), etc. In 1945, Fallada went to live in East Berlin, where he was invited by Johannes R. Becher to work for the Täglichen Rundschau.


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 5

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (44270 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who