Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post Faith v. Business v. Politics
Created by John Eipper on 05/13/19 3:57 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:


Faith v. Business v. Politics (David Duggan, USA, 05/13/19 3:57 am)

I have hesitated to opine on this question of faith v. business v. politics because unlike business or politics, I don't believe that faith can be learned. It can only be shared. You can go to Harvard Business School and become reasonably competent in a business setting. You can go to the Woodrow Wilson School at Princeton (horrors), and become reasonably competent at international affairs (or at least competent enough to earn a living). But you could spend a lifetime at a seminary or monastery, and if you don't have faith, a baseline belief that there is a power outside yourself which you can neither define nor control, you're wasting your time.

Somehow, as readers of my Glimpses of Grace, Reflections of a Life in Christ (WestBow 2013) would realize, I have been given that gift, and have been privileged to share it with others. To some it has fallen on deaf ears (the Parable of the Sower comes to mind), but others have been encouraged, challenged and maybe even caused to re-think their prior assumptions. For this I am grateful, as it is only through sharing these experiences and insights that the faith grows.

Let me try an example. I have traded stock options for the last 10 years or so, but stock options have been around at least since the 19th century when Daniel Drew and Jay Gould traded them privately to squeeze out other owners of railroads (some not so successfully). It was only in the 1970s that "listed options" became traded on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. The question became how to price them (unlike the New York Stock Exchange with its system of specialists who are required to create an orderly market, the CBOE is a pure auction market, with buyers and sellers agreeing on a price). Along came mathematician Fischer Black and economist Myron Scholes (at the University of Chicago, where else) whose "Black-Scholes" method of pricing options became standard fare at business schools. The point is that this was an example of pure intellectual inquiry, backed by empirical observation from a real market.

By contrast, consider the number of bust-out seminarians or gurus whose contributions to the well-being of society have been decidedly negative (Josip Visarijonovič Džugašvili, later Stalin; Grigori Rasputin; guru Rajneesh-he of the 93 Rolls-Royces at an Oregon ashram). Whatever they learned in their formative years was desecrated by their later actions. Some may still follow or respect these leaders, but the movements which they started or fostered can be found on the ash heap of history. Their faith, such as it was, was dashed on the altars of self-indulgence, paranoia, and venality. Anyone who tried to follow their examples of faith would have been sorely disappointed.

There may or not be an inanimate world, a world beyond our senses, a world of beginnings before time. It may have been created by a loving God purely for His pleasure, Who thought in his infinite wisdom that He would bestow on mere mortals the ability to discern good from evil and right from wrong (otherwise sin). That God cannot be found in the heavens or in the libraries or in the laboratories. He can only be found by looking within, and that search cannot be assisted by any man-made tool.

JE comments:  I believe David Duggan has solved our "Jesuit mystery."  Why do some indoctrinees reject and others embrace the theologies they are taught?  Perhaps because matters of faith cannot be taught.

Maybe it's as simple as this: Some possess the "God Gene" and others don't.

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (1)
Informational value100%

Visits: 187


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

  • The "Gift" of Faith, and an Encounter at Starbucks (from Gary Moore) (John Eipper, USA 05/15/19 4:29 AM)

    Gary Moore writes:

    I'm going to hazard a response to David Duggan's note of May 13th,
    which articulately says that faith, meaning religious faith, as
    exampled by his own deep faith, is a gift.

    I think I may agree,
    in that "gift" has metaphorical enormity to take in the unknown.
    A gift sets apart its recipient from those who don't get it, and
    this is the mystery we've been exploring: Why can some people
    so deeply believe in what others don't find believable? As we've
    seen in this thread, mere religious indoctrination is not the answer,
    since it causes many to rebel and scoff at the stage props behind the
    curtain, while others emerge profoundly engaged...

    Oops--just as I was typing these words, in a peaceful Starbucks store,
    a voice said hello and I looked up to see a very intelligent acquaintance, Tim Guess,
    who is also an evangelical missionary in Central America. He asked what
    I was writing about, and immediately the deep question of why some of
    us believe could be explored through a living, impressively bright source.
    He said when he had come to belief he found a great peace, a "resting,"
    with a very solid confidence. But was it cultural? Had he been born under
    Islam, could a very similar-looking "resting" have come with different labels?
    He said, just as calmly and thoughtfully as before, that only Jesus rose from
    the grave. But how did he know that? There were 500 witnesses, he said.
    I kept things off the road of "Yeah, but..." and said it still looked to me like
    some people have a gift for coming to the great sense of rightness that can
    make such a difference in life. Well, I do confess I wasn't able to resist asking
    him about the Holy Ghost and three-in-one. He seemed more or less to say
    this is a mystery we should accept because it's reasonable--reasonable to him.
    So back to Square One.

    My larger point here, though, is quite different: I said to my sudden source
    that I agreed with him about many of the ways of faith, in that this very
    moment, our sudden conversation, could be looked at as a confirmation.

    But to me it confirms the profoundness of our ignorance about the ways our own
    elusive minds are part of whatever it might be that we choose to label as being ineluctibly
    larger--a something whose obscure but occasionally startling ways very much include
    our own mental machinations. Of course Tim knew the answer to that one, too,
    but was too polite to proselytize me on it.

    Is it really as simple as all of us being lost in the great wood, and some seeing more specific
    shapes than others?  Reaching this question gives me a sense of peace, a sort of resting.

    JE comments:  The God Gene?  Agnostics and atheists often assume, even if they don't say it, that True Believers are naïve at best, simple-minded at worst.  Yet there's no correlation between measurable intelligence and religious conviction.  Or is there?  One can Google a number of studies such as the following in Psychology Today.  One of the conclusions:  intelligent people are less likely to conform.


    (You've found a peaceful Starbucks, Gary?  If so, I recommend you keep the location secret.)

    Please login/register to reply or comment:

    • Religion, Man, and the Forest (John Heelan, -UK 05/15/19 1:41 PM)
      Gary Moore asked on 15 May: "Is it really as simple as all of us being lost in the great wood, and some seeing more specific shapes than others?"

      Oh yes, the old wood analogy! I remember a feminist quote, "If a man is alone in a wood, is any decision he makes intrinsically wrong?" The answer is a scornful "of course!"

      JE comments:  I am reminded of my favorite student interpretation (ever) of a Pablo Neruda poem.  Neruda's iconic "Walking Around" begins with the statement:  "Sucede que me canso de ser hombre/It just so happens I'm tired of being a man."  Why?  The answer is simple:  the poet wants to be a woman.

      Please login/register to reply or comment:

      • The Forest, Dante, and Non-Sequiturs (from Gary Moore) (John Eipper, USA 05/17/19 4:41 AM)

        Gary Moore writes:

        As to my analogy about being lost in the great wood, I'm glad
        John Heelan (May 15) was struck by that question, but I thought
        the reference would be perhaps too obvious to Dante.

        I'm at sea
        (or at wood?) as to how both Johns have seemed to take it toward
        feminism. Because of one sentence with a forest metaphor? I've got
        to get out of the 14th century and wake up and smell the coffee.
        ("Hey, wow, look at that flying saucer!" "Yeah, reminds me of a dog
        I had once...")

        JE comments:  But Gary, some of the best WAIS discussions begin as non-sequiturs!  Still, I urge us to return to the topic at hand:  Cute Animals in Socks:


        Please login/register to reply or comment:

        • Polari, A-Slang, Backslang (John Heelan, -UK 05/18/19 4:42 AM)
          Gary Moore responded (17 May) about non sequiturs.

          Having had to study dead languages like Latin and Greek as a teenager, I am comforted that language creation still thrives, such as reported in Fabulosa! The Story of Polari, Britain's Secret Gay Language, by Paul Baker, 1 Jul 2019.

          As teenagers we sometimes hid our conversations from parents and others in authority by using "A-slang," "Backslang" and other disguised languages. Some of my family were Cockneys, born and bred, and automatically used the first words of rhyming slang, e.g. trouble (and strife)=wife, plates of meat=feet, barnet fair=hair, boat race=face, apples and pears=stairs.

          A frequently used pejorative borrowed from Yiddish was "bleedin' schnorrer" when somebody was describing somebody else who has upset them in some way.

          Language lives!

          JE comments:  How is it that after a lifetime's fascination with language, I never heard of Polari?  It's not just a language of the gay culture, but is shared by other marginalized groups:  circus performers, merchant sailors, criminals and prostitutes (per Wikipedia).  It borrows heavily from Italian (polari from parlare), Romani, Yiddish, and Cockney rhyming slang.  Wikipedia gives a fairly complete glossary:


          The Paul Baker book is dated July 2019--I presume that means it's forthcoming?  You can pre-order on Amazon.

          Please login/register to reply or comment:

    • Ric Mauricio Explains the Trinity (John Eipper, USA 05/21/19 4:14 AM)

      Ric Mauricio writes:

      The essay "Why Are Religious People (Generally) Less Intelligent?" is very interesting.  (John E appended it to Gary Moore's post of May 15th:  https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mr-personality/201312/why-are-religious-people-generally-less-intelligent )

      It actually puts into writing my opinion of religionists in general. But I have to be careful not to think I am more intelligent than my Christian (or any other religion) friends just because I am more questioning.  That could lead to arrogance. I just have to smile, when they always end the discussions with "you just have to believe."

      But let me attempt to explain to Gary my take on the Holy Trinity. To me it is not a mystery, but most religionists fail to comprehend the true meaning of the Holy Trinity. God the father (or as Tor would put it, God the universe) is the universe and everything that makes up the universe, from the smallest grain of sand to the largest stars (and yes, everything is made up of very micro atomic particles; totally blows my mind, this scientific stuff). God the man is the physical manifestation of an intelligent being created by these subatomic particles. Yes, it is possible that there are other beings just as intelligent as humans, although I am finding that intelligent may be an overused adjective these days. OK, so they might be missing the third branch of the Trinity. God the Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost is enlightenment (ah yes, Zen and Buddhism share this concept). A question I asked my Buddhist mechanic as I pointed out his statue of the Buddha, complete with burning incense: isn't the Buddha something that exists within us? He smiled, and said "ah yes, you understand." When the disciples were suddenly beset upon by the Holy Spirit, it transformed them from the scared disciples of Christ to brave men willing to face martyrdom.

      Being a non-conformist or as I like to call myself, a gadfly, I will always question the prevalent opinion of the group. Yeah, gets me into a lot of hot water.

      JE comments:  Could we describe Buddhism as the ultimate articulation of the Holy Spirit?  Ric Mauricio does an admirable job of synthesizing the world's religions.  I have nothing profound to add here, so I'll close with a nod to OSHA:  with all the solvents and oily rags around, isn't it a really bad idea to burn incense in a mechanic's shop?

      Please login/register to reply or comment:

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (44453 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who