Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post re: Cuba, Indonesia and US Financial Claims (Andrew Johnson, Australia)
Created by John Eipper on 01/09/10 4:49 AM - re-cuba-indonesia-and-us-financial-claims-andrew-johnson-australia

Previous posts in this discussion:


re: Cuba, Indonesia and US Financial Claims (Andrew Johnson, Australia) (John Eipper, USA, 01/09/10 4:49 am)

Andrew Johnson responds to Cameron Sawyer's post of 8 January: In answer to Cameron Sawyer's question about the US trusting governments which nationalize assets, I offer that the US seems to have a tradition of trust in such governments. The US seems to have been content when Saddam Hussein nationalised the Dutch Shell assets in 1972. And when Sukarno's Japanese partners left at the end of WWII, the US newspapers and government seemed to call Sukarno and his militia heroes for keeping hold of the Shell assets. Despite nationalisation of the Shell oil assets, Indonesia seems to have enjoyed a favoured nation status with the US, which has provided military aid to Indonesia since 1949. The US has also remained politely silent throughout the atrocities of the 1960s to now. The shooting of suspected GAM supporters in the weeks after the tsunami was one of hundreds of acts which our media and governments seem to develop instant amnesia about. For WAIS reference, Article 33 of the Indonesian constitution says All natural resources in the soil and the waters of the country are under the jurisdiction of the State and shall be used for the greatest benefit and welfare of the People. Indonesia also passed "Law 44" in 1960, formally nationalising all oil & gas exploration and mining, reducing the foreign engineers to contractors of the assets they had developed and managed. By 1965 Shell sold all of its remaining assets to Pertamina. The long-term reality of the Republic of Indonesia (RI) is that Shell concessions were replaced by Exxon & Bechtel as contractors, Freeport and NewMont got access to new mineral wealth without the restrictions which the US would impose on those companies domestically, and Portugal Oil was replaced by ConocoPhillips in the Timor sea. So why should Cuba be the only country where the government's moral conduct is considered a factor? Doing business with Cuba seems a lot more moral than doing business with the RI.

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 4


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (44621 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who