Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post U Michigan Pays Large Sum for CRT Seminars: "Daily Caller"
Created by John Eipper on 11/08/21 3:00 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:


U Michigan Pays Large Sum for CRT Seminars: "Daily Caller" (Francisco Wong-Diaz, USA, 11/08/21 3:00 am)

Here JE, you can make some easy money without leaving your home or state!


JE comments: But Francisco, I don't offer Critical Race Theory seminars! I do have a snazzy PowerPoint on the Spanish-American War of 1898, which I presented last week virtually at Minnesota State University.  (Thank you for the opportunity, Enrique Torner!)

The Daily Caller is not the most stellar example of journalistic integrity, but I presume the story is accurate.  It gives us an entry into today's hot-button culture topic:  Critical Race Theory.  So far WAIS has mostly avoided the subject, but should we give it a go?  Here are the two intransigent positions:  CRT is either a much-overdue correction of the historical record, or nothing less than the "cancellation" of the American way of life.  A question for the WAISitudes:  what is so threatening about exposing the race injustices of our past--of which, sadly, there are many?


Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 248


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

  • Critical Race Theory: How is the Truth Threatening? (Carmen Negrin, -France 11/08/21 9:51 AM)

    In response to John E's question on the Critical Race Theory controversy, I personally consider that telling the truth is never a danger, in any case not when it comes to history. The danger is ignoring or telling a lie/fiction.

    In politics, it is more a problem of how and even when the truth is told.

    Regarding US history, in particular, the relation with the indigenous people, slavery, politics and the mafia, politics and religion, etc., there would be a lot to say and, in my view, nothing to hide and perhaps, a lot to be gained.

    JE comments:  CRT is finally front and center at WAIS.  We should strive for some definitions.  Must the goal of "truth" in historical inquiry lead to cancellations, iconoclasm and calls for reparations?  How do you repair a wrong when both the perpetrators and the victims are dead? 

    I presume the outrage of the anti-CRTers has nothing to do a fear of the truth, but of what measures may be taken as a result.  Shouldn't CRT be divided into an academic side and an activist one? Those of us in Academia well know that there's a huge difference between the two.

    Please login/register to reply or comment:

  • Critical Race Theory...What About Critical Height Theory? (Jordi Molins, -Spain 11/08/21 11:07 AM)
    John Eipper has opened Pandora's Box on Critical Race Theory.

    Why are some forms of discrimination publicly accepted to exist, while others are not? For example, it can be argued that short men are heavily discriminated against. Short men have lower income, attain worse educational levels, and have more difficulty finding a satisfying sexual partner. There is no single advantage in being a short man. However, our society does not believe we have to "amend this injustice." Even more surprisingly, short men do not publicly complain about their status (even though for sure they could).

    The same could be said about overweight people. But overweight people have at least the possibility to reverse their condition. A short man has no way to escape his fate.

    How should we measure discrimination? How do we rank humans in ascending order of injustice/preference?

    Full disclosure: I am a short man (at least, by American standards).

    JE comments: I know of one advantage. Flying on Spirit Airlines is merely uncomfortable for the short. For tall people, it's tantamount to Inquisitorial torture, albeit with water available "for purchase."

    Jordi, you are correct. In the US, the taller presidential candidate almost always wins, although Biden is slightly less tall than Trump.  I say "less tall," because Uncle Joe stands an impressive six feet.  We'll really put this hypothesis to the test if all 5 feet, 2 inches of Kamala Harris ever runs.  She will almost assuredly be the spatially disadvantaged one.

    Please login/register to reply or comment:

    • Short People and Chicago Politics (David Duggan, USA 11/09/21 3:50 AM)
      Jordi Molins and John E wrote about the political advantages of tall people. But what about poseurs such as Rahm Emanuel, Richard M. Daley (King Richard II), and "Lockdown" Lori Lightfoot (who probably doesn't clear 5').

      Of course, this is only about mayors of Chicago, which at one point had Big Bill Thompson as mayor, some 6 feet and 300 lbs.

      JE comments:  Mayor Lightfoot stands 5' 1", and Rahm Emanuel is 5' 7".

      How many knew that LBJ was 6' 4" tall, every bit as towering as Lincoln?  Or that George W Bush was some three inches shorter than his father?  Here's something I suspect about Google:  enter "Person X height" and you usually get an inch or two taller than reality.

      We Americans elect tall guys to lead us.  Contrast Clinton-Obama-Trump-Biden, all over 6 feet, with Putin at 5' 7".  His spiritual predecessor Stalin was just 5' 5".

      Please login/register to reply or comment:

  • Critical Race Theory: Bastian Contrario Weighs In... (Eugenio Battaglia, Italy 11/10/21 2:25 AM)
    Our esteemed moderator has asked for comments on Critical Race Theory. This is a "wedding invitation" for a Bastian Contrario.

    This Bastian has a few points:

    1) In spite of its very good intentions, CRT has some drawbacks. In the recent past, worldwide public opinion reached the conclusion that human beings were all one race but with different cultures.  None is superior to another.  Different cultures developed according to local conditions, so CRT is a step backward, putting the concept of race back into play.

    If we take this to an absurd extreme, we may even say that among the different cultures there is the one that appreciates the paintings at the Sistine Chapel, and another which appreciates the delicacy of human flesh. Further, the latter could be considered superior, as it is able to control the demographic explosion while protecting biological diversity and the environment, as it is not wasting anything and is not creating intensive farming with its emission of gases that exacerbate climate change.

    2) In the specific case of the US, this nation was the final act of a long chain of slavery starting from Abraham (remember Agar?) all the way down.  The slave trade flourished in Africa, where the local independent "empires" held people in slavery and were extremely happy to sell them to Arab raiders who took them to the East, North, and West Coasts to be sold.

    Ghezo, king of Dahomey, said in 1849: "Slavery is the principle that leads my people. It is the source of our glory and of our wellbeing."

    3) Slavery in the world lasted officially until 1980, when Mauritania finally abolished it, but some kinds of slavery still exist in some Arab countries of the Gulf.  See the treatment of labor forces coming from the Philippines, Bangladesh, etc.

    The first European Country to abolish slavery was the Republic of Venice in 960, but most probably this involved Christian slaves only, as apparently Saracen prisoners were used in its galleys. The Free Italian Republic of Ragusa (now Dubrovnik in Croatia) abolished all slavery in 1412, but it was on the occasion of changing its great fleet from the old galleys to the new sailing ships.

    Personally, I saw photos of the Italian troops freeing the enslaved from their chains in Ethiopia. The present war there is the continuation of the wars existing at that time and a reason why many ethnic groups acclaimed the Italian intervention.

    When I was in Mena Saud my Saudi skipper once asked me when he saw me being friendly with the other skipper, my Eritrean friend Amin.  He asked, "In Europe do you like Black people?" As he was rather brownish I thought that he was referring to himself, so I answered "Yes, why not?" He replied: "Oh, for us they are good only as slaves." Later, when I had already left the place he killed my friend Amin. Professional jealousy?

    4) Finally the worst part of Critical Race Theory is that does not consider the problem as a whole.  As a result, it makes racism worse.

    JE comments:  Bastian, your reflections above are not all that Contrario in US circles, where opposition to CRT has become mainstream.  While there's nothing offensive (I trust) in exposing history's warts, the outrage is about the "cancellation" of monuments, the renaming of military bases, and the like.  Political opportunism no doubt plays a crucial role--it's apparent that stirring up anti-CRT frenzy wins votes.  Just look at the Virginia governor's race last week.

    If I were running a school district, I would repackage CRT with a less threatening name.  Historical Truthism?  Justice for the Forgotten?  Other suggestions are welcome.

    Please login/register to reply or comment:

    • CRT: Parents Say "No" to Marxist Indoctrination (Francisco Wong-Diaz, USA 11/10/21 10:58 AM)
      I am glad that JE is not running a school district and disguising Marxist indoctrination by using renaming subterfuges.

      Teaching our children to read, write, learn math and how to think is what parents demand. JE should try to adopt a child and learn what it means to parent.

      JE comments: Amigo Francisco, words you minceth not.  I fail to see the dichotomy you establish between "Marxist indoctrination" on the one hand, and thinking (with reading and writing as tools for this) on the other.  Properly taught, a critical view of US history requires much reading, of primary and secondary sources, and writing to reflect, process and interpret.  "Critical" implies engagement, not the rote memorization that teaching history used to demand.

      And even math--students need to understand, for example, how the "3/5 Rule" was born of southern demographics, and what this meant for the marginalization of African Americans.

      Most of all, CRT in its ideal execution teaches empathy, towards the oppressed peoples of the past, with the Santayana-inspired hope that its mistakes will never be repeated.

      Please login/register to reply or comment:

      • Anger is Not Argumentation (Francisco Ramirez, USA 11/11/21 3:57 AM)
        In response to Francisco Wong-Díaz, I have no idea what JE would be like as a parent.

        However, as both parent and grandparent, I taught my children and grandchildren that displays of anger do no add up to thinking. I also taught them that ad hominem arguments do not influence those with whom you disagree.

        The late Randy Black and I did not see eye to eye on a number of issues. But he did change my thinking about the JFK assassination though a careful marshaling of evidence to debunk some conspiracy assumptions. Had he merely name-called those with whom he disagreed, he would have been ineffective.

        Of course, WAIS can be a platform for competing ideas as well as an opportunity for personal venting.

        JE comments:  It's hard to believe that one of the pillars of WAISdom, Randy Black, has been gone for over two years.  Randy was an investigative journalist at heart, but with a strong personal viewpoint.  State your opinions, but back them up with facts.

        For you newbies, here's my tribute from April 2019:


        Francisco, you point out a truism of the ages:  Ad hominem attacks only stiffen your antagonist's position.  Yet this begs the question of why they persist.  Because they satisfy the attacker?  I would offer that they can be very profitable, especially in the political arena.  Look no further than the Trump Playbook.

        Please login/register to reply or comment:

      • With CRT, Who Gets Victim Status? (Eugenio Battaglia, Italy 11/11/21 6:08 AM)

        John E wrote that Critical Race Theory "in its ideal execution teaches empathy towards the oppressed peoples of the past."

        All very good, but...

        I do not see any empathy towards the Germans of the Sudetenland, Danzig, etc., the Italians from Fiume, Zara, Pola, Tenda, the Poles of Lwow, the Hungarians in many areas outside Hungary, the Serbians of Kosovo, the Palestinians, and I could go on at length.

        But the first thing to consider is that you cannot repair a previous wrong with another wrong.

        JE comments: The question for our times: Who has the right to claim victim status? You can get in trouble for pitying the Germans, for example, even though they suffered enormously after WWII--see, for example, Keith Lowe's very disturbing book Savage Continent (2012).  Can we add a "Chickens Shall Roost" corollary to the Victimhood Theory?  Or even more controversial, the notion that the Israelis get a carte blanche-by-default to oppress the Palestinians because of the Holocaust?

        Let's be clear:  CRT as presently defined refers primarily to the African American experience in the US, with Latinos and Asians far behind.  Other marginalized "hyphenated" groups (Irish-Americans, Italian-Americans, Jewish Americans, etc. etc.) don't count.  Such an approach is not "critical" enough.

        Please login/register to reply or comment:

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (44643 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who