Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Both Sides Should Be Heard
Created by John Eipper on 11/21/20 3:10 PM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Both Sides Should Be Heard (Nicholas Ruiz III, USA, 11/21/20 3:10 pm)

Thank you, John. I've read and appreciate all of the time and energy put forth by WAISers to share their thoughts on these and other matters.

Regardless of political affiliation (I've identified as No Party Affiliation, Green and Democrat at different times in life--I currently identify as NPA), my political lens is always non-partisan and issue-based, and policy ideas of merit I find are often available on both sides of the aisle, depending upon the issue at hand and its level of politicization. For example, the environment and oceans should be preserved, cared for and responsibly managed--but what that means in practice may be less than ideal from an excessively partisan point of view, which I do not support.

However, the election proceedings as we've witnessed lately in the USA are an absolute fiasco--and it's best to be informed about both sides of the case. Claims and issues are being raised which cannot be ignored. Most of what has been presented in mass media circulation are simply hit pieces, which are not journalism, and it's sad to recognize that such activity passes for news. The New York Times for example, has certainly produced some good writing in the past, but their work as of late is not representative of it. Much of it now reads like the work of embedded trolls.

If you haven't had a chance to watch the entire Giuliani press conference, you should try to make time to review it. There is information within it that is simply not being adequately recorded and reported, and at present forms the only basis for ascertaining what claims exactly are being made, none of which, if true, have anything to do with Trump (like or dislike him, but it's irrelevant), but rather, the electoral process in the USA. Summarily, the conference illustrates one side's case as they see it, which is not being responsibly reported by the mass media, which in itself is unacceptable.

I cannot offer a review, but do offer a recommendation that each side be given their proper time on the floor to speak and provide their best evidence, so citizens may hear and evaluate what they have to say; no more or less for either side.

JE comments:  Certainly one should hear every side.  But why is there an "other" side in this election cycle?  One thing we can safely assume:  2020 was the first outcome in modern times to be contested with ample conviction and few facts, but it won't be the last.

Let's put it in another way:  if Trump were a "normal" politician (think George HW Bush or Jimmy Carter), does anyone seriously believe he would refuse to concede the election?


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 382

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

  • Jimmy Carter's Premature Concession in 1980 (Edward Jajko, USA 11/22/20 10:03 AM)
    In his comments on Nicholas Ruiz III's post of November 21st, John E asked if anyone seriously doubts whether a "normal" politician in Trump's position would have conceded the election by now. As examples, John cited Jimmy Carter and George HW Bush.

    If I recall correctly, "normal politician" Jimmy Carter conceded to Ronald Reagan too soon, while polls in western states, on the highly populous West Coast, and of course Alaska and Hawaii were still open. The presidential contest had indeed been settled, but many voters in the West who were waiting in line, hearing of the concession, decided there was no point in voting on something that had already been decided, and left--affecting voting for other offices, propositions, etc.


    JE comments: I remember 1980, seeing television interviews with California voters waiting to vote in an election that was already decided. Didn't the press make a pact after 1980, never to "call" an election until 8 PM Pacific (11 PM Eastern)? This is what happened, for example, in 2008.  In '12, the AP waited until 11:38 PM.

    Please login/register to reply or comment:


Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (43359 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who