Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post Thoughts on Balance of Trade, Autarky
Created by John Eipper on 10/17/20 3:29 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:


Thoughts on Balance of Trade, Autarky (Eugenio Battaglia, Italy, 10/17/20 3:29 am)

I am a great fan of the WAIS posts from my good friend Tor Guimaraes, but this time (October 16th) I was perplexed by one sentence.

Probably this is due to the brainwashing carried out by our mainstream politicians/media, which in order to justify Italy's role of colony of the Empire and the so-called European Union, cite Italy's huge national debt of 136% of GDP (as in the US) and rising with the Covid-19 pandemic.

By the way, in 2019 Russia had only 16%, Japan 238%, China 47%, etc.

History shows that an Empire with a huge debt is doomed in the long run. The great strength of the US was not only that it was isolated by two oceans and weak countries on the north and south, but also because it could have/produce everything that it needed. A foolish idea is crossing my mind: Mexico cannot invade the US with an army but being smart it is invading the US with undocumented immigrants like the Africans and Asians are doing with Italy, but this is another story.

Therefore I am perplexed by Tor's sentence, "Since there's nothing inherently wrong with importing more than we export in total," or better the sentence is correct only if the commercial debt is compensated by other revenues such as transportation freight (but the US commercial fleet has been reduced), tourism (but in a pandemic crisis, the infrastructure of the tourist sector has become an additional debt), etc.

I believe that some autarky, especially for vital production, is necessary.  After that, free trade is acceptable--seeking, however, a balance of imports/exports.

I know that autarky is now a bad word, so I will quote from the article "L'Autarchia e gli Sviluppi del Commercio Estero" by Carlo Conti on the Rivista Internazionale di Studi Sociali, March 1940 edited by the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan:

"Autarky does not condemn international trade, but aims rather at rendering it reciprocally more convenient. Besides, it strengthens their base through a more rational valuation of the energies and resources of the interested countries in a wider field of international possibilities."

JE comments:  For the last half-century, autarky has indeed become a bad word.  Now we associate it with dysfunctional nations like Cuba and North Korea.  I once read however that autarky is practiced everywhere--on a little sphere known as Planet Earth.  The Conti quote above is rather confusing, but I think it says that autarky is good and doesn't necessarily preclude international trade.  Can we derive any lessons from this 80 years later?

Crises tend to bring out calls for autarky.  An example:  the lack of domestically produced equipment to combat the pandemic.  But then the crisis subsides, and we forget.

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 127


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (43190 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who