Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Appraising Trumponomics
Created by John Eipper on 10/16/20 10:24 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Appraising Trumponomics (Tor Guimaraes, USA, 10/16/20 10:24 am)

Since 2016 it was hopeful to hear our great stupendous President Trump saying that he was going to make a better relationship with China regarding trade imbalances and fairness. When he chose direct confrontation with China and our political military allies to improve trade deals, I first realized he was doomed to failure.

Indeed, the talk among honest experts is that he has failed. For example, Chris Rogers in the latest episode of the Yahoo Finance Electionomics podcast states, "The fact that he's gone to war with other countries and regions in trade has meant they've put tariffs on. So that's cut exports."

Others agree that Trump's tariffs on imports from China and many other countries in 2018 had predictable consequences: Most countries retaliated with their own tariffs on imports from the US. Trump's tariffs on about $355 billion worth of imports range from 7.5% to 25%. Just like a tax on the consumers, the American Action Forum estimates the cost of tariffs, including the loss of efficiencies, totals around $57 billion per year, which depresses growth at a time when Covid is taking a heavy economic toll.

Bottom line: The total US trade deficit in 2016 was $481 billion; the Trump "fix" to it for the last 12 months (through August) was $599 billion, or 25% larger than the year before Trump took office.

Since there's nothing inherently wrong with importing more than we export in total, most economists say it's more important to focus on having a robust manufacturing sector building high-value products, a sophisticated service sector, and the US consumers having strong purchasing power. Stupidly, Trump's advisors steered him religiously to reducing trade deficits. Now he is failing by his own metrics.

JE comments:  How might we sum up Trumponomics?  Can we say there even is such a thing?  In many senses it's made up on the fly.  Equal parts protectionism, tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, and reduced regulations.  Protectionism should lead to increases in domestic manufacturing, but there is not much evidence of this happening.

Anyone want to have a go at this question?  Define Trumponomics in one paragraph or less.  One should also allow for the massive stimulus packages we've seen at the expense of raising the national debt to 136% of GDP.  That's nearly $30 trillion, or close to $100K for every human in this nation.


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 289

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

  • Thoughts on Balance of Trade, Autarky (Eugenio Battaglia, Italy 10/17/20 3:29 AM)
    I am a great fan of the WAIS posts from my good friend Tor Guimaraes, but this time (October 16th) I was perplexed by one sentence.

    Probably this is due to the brainwashing carried out by our mainstream politicians/media, which in order to justify Italy's role of colony of the Empire and the so-called European Union, cite Italy's huge national debt of 136% of GDP (as in the US) and rising with the Covid-19 pandemic.


    By the way, in 2019 Russia had only 16%, Japan 238%, China 47%, etc.


    History shows that an Empire with a huge debt is doomed in the long run. The great strength of the US was not only that it was isolated by two oceans and weak countries on the north and south, but also because it could have/produce everything that it needed. A foolish idea is crossing my mind: Mexico cannot invade the US with an army but being smart it is invading the US with undocumented immigrants like the Africans and Asians are doing with Italy, but this is another story.


    Therefore I am perplexed by Tor's sentence, "Since there's nothing inherently wrong with importing more than we export in total," or better the sentence is correct only if the commercial debt is compensated by other revenues such as transportation freight (but the US commercial fleet has been reduced), tourism (but in a pandemic crisis, the infrastructure of the tourist sector has become an additional debt), etc.


    I believe that some autarky, especially for vital production, is necessary.  After that, free trade is acceptable--seeking, however, a balance of imports/exports.


    I know that autarky is now a bad word, so I will quote from the article "L'Autarchia e gli Sviluppi del Commercio Estero" by Carlo Conti on the Rivista Internazionale di Studi Sociali, March 1940 edited by the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan:


    "Autarky does not condemn international trade, but aims rather at rendering it reciprocally more convenient. Besides, it strengthens their base through a more rational valuation of the energies and resources of the interested countries in a wider field of international possibilities."


    JE comments:  For the last half-century, autarky has indeed become a bad word.  Now we associate it with dysfunctional nations like Cuba and North Korea.  I once read however that autarky is practiced everywhere--on a little sphere known as Planet Earth.  The Conti quote above is rather confusing, but I think it says that autarky is good and doesn't necessarily preclude international trade.  Can we derive any lessons from this 80 years later?


    Crises tend to bring out calls for autarky.  An example:  the lack of domestically produced equipment to combat the pandemic.  But then the crisis subsides, and we forget.

    Please login/register to reply or comment:


  • Defining Trumponomics (Tor Guimaraes, USA 10/17/20 4:10 AM)
    Commenting on my last post, John Eipper asked, "How might we sum up Trumponomics? Can we say there even is such a thing? In many senses it's made up on the fly. Equal parts protectionism, tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, reduced regulations..."

    My definition of Trumponomics: A personal set of social political economic policies, whereby the primary objective is to encourage or execute, legal or illegal activities expected to quickly produce massive wealth for the leader and his friends. Because traditional science-based national economic policy is designed for the benefit of the nation, it conflicts directly with Trumponomics regarding the ultimate results from protectionism, tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, environmental destruction, etc.


    Thus, only by incessant hiding, obfuscation, confusion, misrepresentation, misdirection, and bullying of anyone seeking the facts, the leader repeats that all is going extremely well to hide the yawning gap between the leader's fleecing motivation and the national interest.


    JE comments:  Rather critical, I'd say.  (!)  One curiosity:  Is Trumponomics entirely new, or is it a modern twist on the caudillo/strongman economic policies of yore--meaning, an amalgam of populism, nationalism and cronyism, with the foremost goal of gaining personal advantage?


    Latin America may provide some lessons on this.  Tor, do you see any precursors of Trumponomics in Brazilian history?


    Please login/register to reply or comment:

    • Does Trumponomics Have a Precursor? (Tor Guimaraes, USA 10/19/20 4:18 AM)
      John Eipper commented on my post of October 17th: "Is Trumponomics entirely new, or is it a modern twist on the caudillo/strongman economic policies of yore--meaning, an amalgam of populism, nationalism and cronyism, with the foremost goal of gaining personal advantage? Latin America may provide some lessons on this. Tor, do you see any precursors of Trumponomics in Brazilian history?"

      America, by supposedly being the land of the free and home of the brave, freedom, democracy, exceptionalism, etc., seemed immune to Trumpism or Trumponomics. Up to now the latter, aka "Trickle-down economics" in a much milder form, has been often well disguised in developed nations around the world in many different forms. But it occurs whenever and wherever leaders squeeze their own people to enrich themselves and their partners.


      As defined in an earlier post, the term "Trumponomics" represents a set of personally focused social political economic policies which have been responsible for countless wars, financial crises, etc. all over the world, including Latin America. Quite obviously, Bolsonaro today provides a perfect example for this phenomenon in Brazil, but history has many similar cases but never made so shocking by an added scourge like Covid-19.


      I wrote before on this Forum, that I believed Trump could be good to America because his blatantly careless style about so many serious things would allow the masses to make a connection between Trumponomics and the realities on Main Street. In that fashion he could provide a unique, and perhaps his only, service to the American people. That is turning out to be the case, except despite all the evidence, a significant proportion of Americans (Christian Fundamentalists and White Supremacists at the forefront), insist on advancing their Trump-based agendas.


      JE comments:  Tor, are you saying that Trump's biggest contribution to society is a wake-up call; meaning, see what you get when you elect a guy like Trump?  Comparisons of Trump to Latin American caudillos tend to focus on their authoritarian style, jingoistic nationalism and cult of personality.  They omit the economic component, which tends to cloak personal ambition in a veneer of populism.  Here's a recent example from Mexican academic Jorge G. Castañeda:


      https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/06/opinions/trump-caudillo-comparison-castaneda/index.html


      Please login/register to reply or comment:



Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (43191 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who