Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post Coronavirus Epidemic and the CPC Coverup: Is Xi at Risk?
Created by John Eipper on 02/11/20 2:03 PM

Previous posts in this discussion:


Coronavirus Epidemic and the CPC Coverup: Is Xi at Risk? (Paul Levine, Denmark, 02/11/20 2:03 pm)

I'm not surprised by Timothy Ashby's revelations (February 11th) about the Coronavirus epidemic in China. The CPC has lied about so many self-created disasters over the years--The Great Famine, The Cultural Revolution and the Tiananmen Massacre--that it is incapable of telling the truth. For years it underreported pollution in Chinese cities, so why should it be embarrassed by underreporting coronavirus victims by a factor of ten?

Problems began when the regimes remained silent for two weeks after the first cases of the virus were reported. A Wuhan doctor alerted a few colleagues but was reprimanded by the local police and forced to retract his alert. Shortly after, Dr. Li contracted the virus and died. The angry public reaction to his reprimand and death was cataclysmic. Bill Bishop, proprietor of the excellent China blog called Sinocism, explained last week:

Social media is blowing up over the news that Wuhan whistleblower doctor Li Wenliang has died. This is from the Global Times, in a now deleted report: Chinese doctor Li Wenliang, one of the eight whistleblowers who tried to warn other medics of the coronavirus outbreak but were reprimanded by local police, dies of coronavirus on Thursday in Wuhan, the Global Times has learned.

But in a morbid twist it appears that the relevant authorities, probably after seeing the online uproar, may not be allowing him to die officially yet. There has been quite the back and forth about whether or not he has actually passed. I saw reports from The Global Times, Caixin and The Beijing News that he had died; those are now gone. If they got it wrong then heads will role for making such a consequential “political error.” But from other reports on Wechat it sounds like the order came from above to keep him “alive.”  It is all just so dark.

The reports of Li’s death, true or not, are crystallizing deep anger and frustration. The Party’s social contract with the people—-ensuring the people’s well being and providing ever-increasing economic prosperity--is being stressed on a nationwide level in ways I don’t recall in the past several decades. Last Friday I wrote that "this is as close to an existential crisis for Xi and the Party that I think we have seen since 1989," and I think it is even more so a week later.

Now, just a few days later, the official death toll has surpassed one thousand as the regime reluctantly invited WHO experts to help combat the disaster. Here loss of face is trumped by loss of life. Meanwhile yesterday several senior provincial officials were fired for incompetence or worse. At the same time, President Xi Jinping, wearing a mask, made a rare public appearance in Beijing. Before he had assigned his Prime Minister to lead the fight against the virus in an attempt to distance himself from responsibility. When citizens wondered at Xi's absence, he stated that he was in fact in charge of the regime's efforts to combat the epidemic. Since becoming the leader, Xi has worked brutally to replace the CPC committee structure of governing with one-man rule. He became Emperor Xi Dada.

In the past weeks, social media has been full of angry attacks on local and provincial mismanagement. But attempts to include the Central Government have been abruptly censored. Until now. But for the first time a leading scholar, Xu Zhangrun, charges Xi with responsibility for the regime's failures. This follows another public attack on Xi by another scholar, Xu Zhiyong, who called for Xi to resign. More grievously he said that Xi is "not very smart." He is surely correct. The deification of Xi Jinping is a lovely farce that resembles H. C. Andersen's tale, "The Emperor's New Clothes." Henceforth Xi Jinping should be called Xi NVS.

JE comments:  Many thanks to veteran China-watcher Paul Levine for this insight.  Paul's is one of several analyses to suggest that Xi's bungling of the epidemic endangers his iron grip on power.  Could popular outrage be enough to oust him?  Wouldn't there first be the need for someone in the inner circle to turn against him?

Paul, I hope you'll keep us updated.

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 131


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (42307 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who