Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post Former NH Senator Calls for Commission to Determine Trump's Mental Health
Created by John Eipper on 08/12/17 4:39 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:


Former NH Senator Calls for Commission to Determine Trump's Mental Health (Leo Goldberger, USA, 08/12/17 4:39 am)

Three cheers for Gordon Humphrey, the former New Hampshire Senator, the sole sane voice in the face of our dangerous crisis with a disastrous man at the helm of our nation.  Our Commander-in-Chief promises nothing less than "fire and fury" in his irrational posture of "deal-making" with North Korea. Despite Trump's usual bluff, it is difficult not to see this scenario as playing with fire in the context of an unpredictable Supreme Leader. Kim Jong-un's single-minded aim is to maintain his self-serving, oppressive dictatorship at all costs.

If only there were enough members in Congress with the courage to act upon Gordon Humphrey's urgent appeal for some appropriate action to potentially save millions of lives! Holding on to their seat seems likely more important to most of them--no matter what.

In case you missed it, herewith the link to yesterday's news item:


JE comments:  Humphrey was my US senator during my Dartmouth years, and in the 1980s he was one of the most conservative voices in Washington.  He endorsed Hillary Clinton in the 2016 elections.  Things do change.

What are the chances of a Trump Sanity Commission?  Nil.  Has there been any precedent for such a thing?  The Goldwater Rule, which prohibits psychiatrists from diagnostic speculation, is one of history's few intersections of psychiatry and politics.  It also muzzled a healthy debate on the mental state of politicians.  Too bad.

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 201


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

  • Goldwater Rule (Leo Goldberger, USA 08/13/17 3:33 PM)
    John E's comment about the so-called Goldwater Rule is not really relevant to my recent post, as it only applies to the members of the American Psychiatric Association. Its principles of medical ethics prohibits psychiatrists to give a professional opinion about public figures they have not examined in person, and from whom they have not obtained consent to discuss their mental health in public statements.

    As for invoking the relevant sections of the US twenty-fifth amendment, it clearly makes presidential disability a political and not a medical determination.

    For further enlightening details, see link below:


    JE comments:  The political aspect of the 25th Amendment is precisely why it won't be applied to Trump.  As one of the commentators cited in the Atlantic wrote, the cabinet and the Vice President are still busy "enabling" the President.  To be sure, cracks are emerging, especially regarding Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

    Please login/register to reply or comment:

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (40084 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who