Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Did the US Congress Start the Korean War?
Created by John Eipper on 08/10/17 2:54 PM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Did the US Congress Start the Korean War? (Bienvenido Macario, USA, 08/10/17 2:54 pm)

John E asked me on August 7th:

"Bienvenido, are you saying that the US Congress started the Korean war because it stated that South Korea was outside the US 'defense perimeter'? Meaning, that if the US had drawn a firm line in the sand, the North never would have invaded?"

The UN's decolonization program using FDR's Four Freedoms Doctrine has been a cure worse than the disease, in most cases. Today, people from failed and failing states that became independent after WWII are voting with their feet. Trying to immigrate to or seek refuge in developed nations is the best proof that decolonization is a failure.

FDR was so obsessed with the dismantling of the British Empire that he provided only one option: independence to the colonies.

Genuine democracy is about choices and options. The Left has always been biased towards a one-party system. Another option FDR could have offered was the Compact of Free Association, just like what the Commonwealth of North Mariana Islands, Palau and Marshall Islands enjoy today.

It was in the spirit of the sweet-sounding albeit unenforceable Four Freedom doctrine and decolonization that the decision to abandon South Korea to the communists was made. As John mentioned, South Korea was a colony, not a territory, of Japan. It would be absurd to let Japan keep Korea under its control after WWII and therefore it made perfect sense for Secretary of State Dean Acheson to declare that Korea is outside the US defense perimeter, something US Sen. Tom Connally, Chairman of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, confirmed.

For the Philippines, an abandoned US territory that FDR sacrificed to prove to Churchill that the US is committed to the decolonization and the Four Freedoms doctrine, the preferred solution is granting me official recognition as a Native American.

Sometime after 2004 Prof. Hilton asked me to research the UN Decolonization program. This prompted me to look for alternatives to decolonization. He asked me to pinpoint the exact time in history when the problem or crisis started, and how it might have been avoided. Using lessons learned from previous or ongoing crises such as the refugee crisis in Europe or to avoid future crises would be better.

Prof. Hilton referred me to this 2002 WAIS post: "The United Nations. Decolonization":

http://waisworld.org/go.jsp?id=02a&objectType=post&o=65558&objectTypeId=59808&topicId=161

I consider the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Tom Connally's answer in that crucial interview on May 2, 1950 as the ratification of the executive branch's proposal to abandon South Korea.

What is terrifying is the fact that today no one in Washington DC seems to be aware of how the North Koreans were encouraged by the State Department and the US Senate to attack South Korea.

Those were very irresponsible statements made by Acheson, an American diplomat and Tom Connally, a powerful US Senator. These were very significant episodes in the months before the outbreak of the Korean War and yet no historian, educator or foreign policy expert seemed to remember or even know the true story behind the 1950 Korean War.

JE comments:  Weren't similar arguments made about the first Gulf War--i.e., that the US did not warn Saddam severely enough not to invade Kuwait?  Are statements of non-involvement the same as appeasement?  I don't know the answer to this.  Only hindsight provides clarity.

Decolonization was/is historically inevitable.  A question for Bienvenido:  if the British Empire hadn't been dismantled in 1945-'46, then when?  Never?  France tried to hold on to Algeria, and paid the price for it. 

One not-so-small detail:  Empires are extremely expensive, especially because the paternalistic model of shamelessly exploiting your colonized population is no longer an option.  What nation would now want the bother--and the negative world opinion?


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 152

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (39315 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who