Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Musollini's Intervention in Ethiopia
Created by John Eipper on 02/02/17 3:12 PM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Musollini's Intervention in Ethiopia (Eugenio Battaglia, Italy, 02/02/17 3:12 pm)

Following our esteemed moderator's comment on the interesting post from David Jorge (1 February), herewith I give my expected reply:

First of all, an excellent sentence from David: "No es valorando unos hechos a posteriori como se construye la Historia."  To this I would add, "sino recordándolos todos." [History is not constructed by evaluating events after the fact...rather, it's by remembering everything--JE.]

After so many wars that are praised for humanitarian reasons and/or for bringing "democracy," wars for which Italy in recent years has had to supply cannon fodder, from the Balkans to Africa and to the Middle East, I would like to state that the Abyssinian war was a humanitarian war to free ethnic groups from discrimination, such as the Jewish Falasha or Muslim Galla Sidamo, etc., and to abolish slavery.

I did not come up with this interpretation. It is, more or less, the argument made by Lord Mottiston at the Chamber of Lords on 23 October 1935.

Furthermore, the colonialism of Mussolini was based on cooperation and common development for natives and Italian immigrants. This was honestly recognized by the Negus, who defended them after WWII.

Italy had sponsored the entrance of Ethiopia into the League of Nations in 1923 and had a Treaty of Cooperation after 1928.

But then various casus belli were provoked by the Ethiopians (motivated by European interests?), such as the attack at Ual Ual on 5 December 1934 (supported by a British Group from Somaliland with Colonel Clifford, advisor of the Negus), in which 120 Dubats were killed, or previously on 4 November 1934, when the Italian Consulate at Gondar was attacked, resulting in the deaths of many Ascari, plus various raids by irregular fighters.

The Negus, supported by France and the UK, refused to pay reparations to the families of the dead. Later the League stated: No party is at fault!

Mussolini was pushed to intervene by the king and the Italian Church, etc. He also had, in a certain way, the green light from France's Pierre Laval during his visit to Rome on 4 January 1935 and from England. See the Maffey Report: "For British interests it is indifferent if Ethiopia remains independent or is absorbed by Italy."
In October 1935 Mussolini tried to avoid Sanctions by sending two great leaders of the Jewish Italian Community, Angiolo Orvieto and Dante Lattes, to look for help from his old friend Chaim Weizmann, but instead, he let him down. This was a great mistake.

Note that the Italian Jewish Community, grateful for the good treatment from Mussolini, on 30 January 1930 dedicated a gold medal to him This medal is extremely difficult to find now.

The Sanctions from a certain point of view were a failure because the regime was strengthened by them.

But from another point of view (the real one?), the Sanctions were a success. Mussolini had to be destroyed as his social ideas were extremely dangerous for the capitalist and communist countries, even more dangerous than Hitler's Panzers. It was imperative to push the former into the arms of the latter to be sure of his destruction for good.

JE comments:  First, apologies to Bob Gibbs for publishing a long untranslated paragraph in David Jorge's post.  This time I threw in a "JE" italicized translation.

Eugenio Battaglia's take on the Abyssinian war does not surprise me.  Most will not be convinced by claims of Ethiopian provocation or Mussolini's humanitarian intent, but Eugenio forces us to look in the mirror:  were the US "democracy building" adventures or "wars for humanity" motivated by altruism?  Did they yield better results?

A final comment on this statement:  "It was imperative to push [Mussolini] into the arms of [Hitler] to be sure of his destruction for good."  In 1940, was anyone on the Allied side convinced of the inevitability, or even possibility, of Hitler's destruction?  So why would they want to give him another ally?  Even Franco, greatly weakened by the Civil War, was paid off to keep him neutral...right?


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 166

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (44621 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 US Elections 2020 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who