Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

Post More on "Enhanced Interrogation"; an RT Survey
Created by John Eipper on 12/13/14 10:57 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:


More on "Enhanced Interrogation"; an RT Survey (Eugenio Battaglia, Italy, 12/13/14 10:57 am)

We have spent a good deal of time discussing the so-called enhanced interrogation system, which apparently began after 9/11, but are we sure about this starting date? Is EIT not a longstanding practice? For instance, David Irving in his book Nuremberg the Last Battle clearly indicates how testimonies were extorted. The kind of tortures used in the so-called "Fascist Criminal Camps" for non-cooperators in order to convince them to become cooperators are also well known, but it is not politically correct to remember them.

On a similar topic, I found an interesting poll on RT about enhanced interrogation in the USA. The questions were about the possibility of the CIA being punished:

44% no punishment.
4% yes someone will have to pay.
46% only a couple of low-ranking people will be punished.
6% no one punished, but the CIA will be completely overhauled.

One could make a lot of comments about these numbers.

JE comments: Yes, I'm not sure what to make of the RT numbers.  For starters, was it a poll of US citizens?  (I assume it was not of Russians.)  I'm a bit confused, as an overhaul of the CIA could occur with punishments--at least of some low-level agents.

But weren't the CIA operatives merely carrying out orders?  To be sure, this is not a legal excuse, as Nuremberg determined.

Rate this post
Informational value 
Reader Ratings (0)
Informational value0%

Visits: 20


Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

  • "Enhanced Interrogation"; the Brennan View (Robert Gard, USA 12/13/14 9:01 PM)
    In response to Eugenio Battaglia (13 December), it is clear that harsh interrogation techniques began before EIT was authorized.

    Regarding CIA Director Brennan's press conference, he also said:

    "Irrespective of the role EITs might play in a detainee's provision of useful information, I believe effective, non-coercive methods are available to elicit such information; methods that do not have a counterproductive impact on our national security and on our international standing. It is for these reasons that I fully support the President's decision to prohibit the use of EITs.

    "Our brutal torture program that was so damaging to our national security may possibly have provided some usable information--but maybe not."

    The full Senate report examined every past claim of obtaining important intel that saved American lives, and found them to be false.

    JE comments:  Greetings to all from rainy Guanajuato, Mexico.  "Enhanced Interrogation" has proven to be an extremely provocative topic for WAISworld.  I have many comments in my inbox.  I'll try to get to them all on the morrow.

    Please login/register to reply or comment:

Trending Now

All Forums with Published Content (42026 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications


Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy


Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series


Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust


Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire


Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US


Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)


Geography Maps Tourism Transportation


1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who