Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Monuments to Cromwell
Created by John Eipper on 02/02/13 5:21 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Monuments to Cromwell (Nigel Jones, UK, 02/02/13 5:21 am)

Cameron Sawyer (1 February) is spot-on to spot the irony of a Cromwell statue sited bang outside the Houses of Parliament that he dissolved on several occasions, once with the immortal words re-cycled by the Tory politician Leo Amery, which were the final nail in Neville Chamberlain's hapless Government in 1940, just before it was replaced by Churchill:

"You have sat here too long for any good you may be doing--depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, Go!"

(Cromwell himself was a Member of Parliament--sitting for his native Cambridgeshire.)

His military capabilities were enormous. Having never picked up a sword in anger until he was past 40, Cromwell never lost a battle thereafter, and his masterstroke, Dunbar, was an act of genius worthy of Napoleon. Pinned against a sea by a hostile Scottish army three times his size, with his own men sick of dysentery, he attacked uphill in driving rain and routed his opponents with the loss of a couple of hundred men--masterly!

Actually Cromwell is a hero of mine. (Apart from anything else he was a master of the English language in its Springtime. His original cause was worthy, but having overthrown and finally executed the King, he had no plans for a viable state form to put in place of the monarchy. He himself refused Parliament's offer of the Crown--although he was briefly succeeded by his hopeless son Richard.)

As for the statue, it was erected by an admirer of Cromwell, the Liberal Premier Lord Rosebery in the 1890s. The Liberals were strongly supported by Nonconformist elements, who also admired Cromwell. Nevertheless, opposition to the statue was strong--so strong that the unveiling ceremony had to be performed in the wee hours of the morning!

I think the Victorian historian Thomas Carlyle summed Cromwell up superbly as "a great, bad man."

JE comments: Other "great, bad men"? Napoleon immediately comes to mind. Some men (and women, too) were merely bad, and still others (far fewer), simply great.  What about Stalin?  He looks bad to me, but as Randy Black pointed out earlier today, the Stalin mini-revival in Russia is a celebration of his "great badness." 

Nothing helps the bad become "great, if bad" more than victory in war.


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (1)
100%
Informational value100%
Insight100%
Fairness100%

Visits: 8

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (40192 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who