Login/Sign up

World Association of International Studies

PAX, LUX ET VERITAS SINCE 1965
Post Background of US Recognition of Jerusalem
Created by John Eipper on 12/25/17 3:08 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Background of US Recognition of Jerusalem (Brian Blodgett, USA, 12/25/17 3:08 am)

Putting the recent action by President Trump in US historic context is important.

On October 13, 1995 Senator Bob Dole (R-KS) introduced the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 to the Senate. The long name of the act was An act to provide for the relocation of the United States Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and for other purposes. It went before the 104th US Congress's Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and the House Committee on International Relations. As a note, the 104th Congress was the first time the Republicans controlled both houses since 1954. It passed the Senate on October 24, 1995 and the House on the same day--as a note, President Clinton opted not to sign it or veto it and it became law on November 8, 1995 as Public Law 104-45.

In the act it states that "Jerusalem should remain an undivided city in which the rights of every ethic and religious group are projected; Jerusalem should be recognized as the capital of the State of Israel; and the United States Embassy in Israel should be established in Jerusalem no later than May 31, 1999," with the key word being should throughout.

Although by law Jerusalem was the official capital in the view of the US, Presidents Clinton, Bush, and Obama did not implement the law.

In 2008, candidate Obama called Jerusalem the capital of Israel and after capturing the Democratic nomination he stated that Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel but then he backtracked on his statements.

According to reports, the US is not taking sides on exactly what defines Jerusalem's boundaries, and if the Western Wall is part of the capital or not, just that the city is the capital.

I am not going to comment at this time if the decision was good or bad. I am just providing the facts supporting President Trump's legal action on implementing the provisions of the 1995 Act.

JE comments:  Very informative.  Brian Blodgett reminds us that pre-Trump, US presidents wanted to have it both ways--to "recognize" Jerusalem for political gain at home, but to avoid any real action in order to keep the peace abroad.  Some might call this hypocrisy.  Others call it shrewd politics.


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (0)
0%
Informational value0%
Insight0%
Fairness0%

Visits: 92

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (39824 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who