Login/Sign up
Post Put Confederate Monuments in Mothballs?
Created by John Eipper on 08/25/17 3:29 AM

Previous posts in this discussion:

Post

Put Confederate Monuments in Mothballs? (David Duggan, USA, 08/25/17 3:29 am)

I think the best solution would be to put the offending Confederate statues in mothballs (or their lapidarian equivalent if the statues are in stone rather than bronze) for another 100 years or so, and then put the issue to a vote. Something similar happened when the British Parliament voted in the 1890s to erect a statue in honor of the Lord Protector of the Commonwealth, Oliver Cromwell (d. 1658), who of course had caused the death of an English monarch and indirectly led to the population of insurrectionist Virginia (overwhelmingly populated by expatriate Cavaliers in the 1640s and 1650s). Parliamentarian John George Phillimore responded to the critics (mainly retrograde monarchists and Irish nationalists): "any man who could object to a statue of Cromwell must be imbued with bigotry and party spirit in the highest degree." If 250 years is a sufficient period of limitations to see the merits of a man who cost the realm not only its orb and scepter, but also half of its colonial empire, then maybe we could see a century hence that the Robert E. Lees, Stonewall Jacksons and other defenders of the lost cause were no more misguided than our other enlightened heroes who came together to create a great nation which has since then rescued continents from tyranny and peoples from oppression.

Having written this, I do not favor the equivalent exhumation of Robert E. Lee's body from the R. E. Lee Memorial Episcopal Church in Lexington, VA, to suffer the same fate as Cromwell's body and head on the restoration of the Stuarts to the throne. On Cromwell's 1661 exhumation, his head was put on a pike whence it hung in Westminster Hall until the late 1680s, when it disappeared under mysterious circumstances. Versions have resurfaced and been sold to collectors for sky-high prices. At some point, the dead should be allowed to rest in peace.

JE comments:  Lexington is also the resting place of Gen. Stonewall Jackson.  One of history's many ironies:  The land of Arlington National Cemetery used to belong to Lee's family--specifically, his wife, Mary Anna.  The Union Army confiscated it in the early days of the war.


SHARE:
Rate this post
Informational value 
Insight 
Fairness 
Reader Ratings (1)
100%
Informational value100%
Insight100%
Fairness100%

Visits: 169

Comments/Replies

Please login/register to reply or comment: Login/Sign up

  • Monument Controversies: Columbus in NYC (José Ignacio Soler, Venezuela 08/26/17 9:06 AM)
    I have been following the recent controversies about Confederate monuments and statues in the US, although in a distant and uninterested way.



    But yesterday's news was too much. I saw that in New York there is an initiative to remove the statue of Cristóbal Colón, or Christopher Columbus if you like, because somebody in the Mayor's office considers it a racist offense to the Caribbean people; an expression of racism, or some other nonsense.



    I do not understand, and if I did, I would probably never accept arguments to remove or destroy historical monuments, streets, parks, statues, or the exhumation and removal of bodies and so on, as much as I would not accept the destruction of historical books or documents with the intention of removing from the collective historical memory some character or ideology of the past for the sake of an intellectual movement or grievance.



    There are many examples, many very recent, about changing the names of cities, before and after the USSR; the burning of books in the Hitler and Mao regimes; the destruction of historical monuments and statues by ISIS in Palmyra; the "Ley de la Memoria Histórica" in Spain, which attempts to erase, by decree, the collective historical memory. I believe there are more irrational and emotional motivations behind these unjustified, and somehow barbaric, acts than actual reason.



    Isn't it a very complex task in the present to judge who is an evil or poisonous historical character of the past?



    By eliminating their legacy, whether "good" or "bad," might we also be eliminating important and transcendental aspects of our past?.



    History should not be "physically" removed to justify our present moral standards. Rather, education should be promoted to critically understand them and their acts, not necessarily to justify them.



    However, I must also confess I would feel some satisfaction if all kinds of representations and icons of the current Venezuelan or Cuban regimes were eliminated, but this only would be a very simplistic resolution of my own resentment. But, would it be wise to remove worldwide, what I personally consider "evil"--the revolutionary icons of Chávez, Fidel or Che Guevara?

    JE comments: José Ignacio Soler is singing my tune: education and critical debate over erasing history. Let us channel Santayana: if we forget the past's injustices, we are doomed to repeat them. (Sometimes we both remember and repeat past injustices, but that's another conversation.)


    But what is the proper place for this debate: the public square, or the museum?


    Tell us, Nacho: Has Maduro built a lot of Chávez statues, or has the era of grandiose cult-of-personality monuments itself passed into history?


    [Sorry for the delay in launching today's WAIS.  We had a "storage problem 28" that has just been resolved.]


    Please login/register to reply or comment:


  • A Swastika in Canada (John Heelan, UK 08/27/17 5:08 AM)
    Here is an interesting case in Canada--a recovered German anchor on display in a Quebec park:

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41028895


    JE comments:  Swastikas come in two varieties--the old Sanskrit good-luck symbol, and the much later Nazi appropriation.  The public no longer makes this distinction, but there are surviving examples of prewar swastikas.  I've pointed out before that Angell Hall on the campus of U Michigan has swastika decorations on its exterior columns.  And then there was the K-R-I-T Motor Car company of Detroit, 1909-1916, which used the swastika in its logo.  Google "Krit emblem" for a look.


    Or how about the Coronado Naval Amphibious Base in San Diego, built in 1967?  This one is creepy--and postwar, which makes it creepier.


    http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1881770_1881787_1881780,00.html


    Please login/register to reply or comment:

    • NAACP, "The Crisis," and Swastikas; from Gary Moore (John Eipper, USA 08/28/17 3:27 AM)

      Gary Moore writes:



      Re John Eipper's broader look at the Nazi-style swastika:
      In the early twentieth century before the Nazis came along,
      the NAACP routinely used swastikas as margin decorations
      in its monthly magazine The Crisis. They were very busy working for an end to white supremacy: one more question
      about judging the fashions of the past by the fashions of the present.


      Morality does seem to progress into increasing inclusiveness as the
      Info-World continues its inscrutable blossoming. But this leaves the
      dilemma of universal standards. As we leave behind the standards that
      tolerated human sacrifice or trial by combat, there are (to say the least)
      differing opinions about some universal standard by which to look back
      and judge the befuddled past. It's a trap to use the (probably transient)
      standards (or fashions?) of the befuddled present.


      But this leaves what?
      The voice from the sky?


      JE comments:   The Crisis was founded in 1910 by W. E. B. Du Bois.  The journal continues today as a quarterly.  I Googled "NAACP Crisis swastika cover" and came up with no corresponding images.  Gary Moore is WAISdom's authority on African-American history, and I presume he has seen many archival issues of the journal.  Please tell us moore, Gary:  why would none of the swastika covers be readily accessible on the 'Net?

      Please login/register to reply or comment:

      • More Pre-WWII Swastikas; Salamanca's "Victor" Symbol (Jose Manuel de Prada, Spain 08/29/17 11:10 AM)
        Swastikas figured prominently in the cover and title page of all the volumes of Rudyard Kipling's collected works until, I guess, the eve of World War II.

        In this case it was, certainly, the Buddhist symbol, as I imagine it was the case for the NAACP magazine.


        It is indeed a huge problem when a more or less harmless symbol is given a more sinister meaning by a political movement.


        One example in Spain is the Victor / Vitor anagram you can see all over some buildings in Salamanca, referring to people who have successfully defended a doctoral thesis at the University.


        It was appropriated by the rebels after they won the Civil War, and many people still think it is a Francoist symbol, while it certainly it is not.


        JE comments:  The Salamanca "Víctor" sign (below) is so catchy that Franco copied it upon his victory in 1939.  A shame, really, as it contaminated a very cool symbol of academic achievement.

        Please login/register to reply or comment:


      • NAACP's "The Crisis" and Swastikas; from Gary Moore (John Eipper, USA 08/29/17 1:52 PM)

        Gary Moore writes:



        In response to John E's question, here is a small example that I came across quickly,
        from The Crisis, June 1921, page 58.


        https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/workers/civil-rights/crisis/0600-crisis-v22n02-w128.pdf



        But what are the two
        book-end icons? At first glance they almost look like Torahs
        with a menorah motif, but there's a cross, so Bibles? Have
        I discussed the glimpse of Du Bois as a student in nineteenth-century Germany, spellbound in the drafty lecture room as Ranke
        or some other phenomenal genius was dissecting the world, and at one point making a sharp comment to the class about
        Africans being inferior--and supposedly knowing they are?  Du Bois was so enthralled by the outpowering of knowledge
        otherwise that he scarcely even condemned the comment,
        almost brushing it off, and took back to the States the emblematic
        empire goatee that reminded him of classical erudition.


        What in the world do all those swastikas mean--and the other arcana?
        For one thing, they mean Du Bois was fascinated by the catacombs.


        JE comments:  Thank you, Gary!  There are more swastikas on p. 60.  They function as snazzy dividers between articles, rather like asterisks today.  How about a far-fetched analogy?  Imagine the future horrors of the "Have a Nice Day" smiley-face, should a racist, genocidal regime ever adopt it as a symbol.

        Please login/register to reply or comment:




Trending Now



All Forums with Published Content (38933 posts)

- Unassigned

Culture & Language

American Indians Art Awards Bestiary of Insults Books Conspiracy Theories Culture Ethics Film Food Futurology Gender Issues Humor Intellectuals Jews Language Literature Media Coverage Movies Music Newspapers Numismatics Philosophy Plagiarism Prisons Racial Issues Sports Tattoos Western Civilization World Communications

Economics

Capitalism Economics International Finance World Bank World Economy

Education

Education Hoover Institution Journal Publications Libraries Universities World Bibliography Series

History

Biographies Conspiracies Crime Decline of West German Holocaust Historical Figures History Holocausts Individuals Japanese Holocaust Leaders Learning Biographies Learning History Russian Holocaust Turkish Holocaust

Nations

Afghanistan Africa Albania Algeria Argentina Asia Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Belize Bolivia Brazil Canada Central America Chechnya Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark East Europe East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Estonia Ethiopia Europe European Union Finland France French Guiana Germany Greece Guatemala Haiti Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran (Persia) Iraq Ireland Israel/Palestine Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Korea Kosovo Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Latin America Liberia Libya Mali Mexico Middle East Mongolia Morocco Namibia Nations Compared Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria North America Norway Pacific Islands Pakistan Palestine Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Polombia Portugal Romania Saudi Arabia Scandinavia Scotland Serbia Singapore Slovakia South Africa South America Southeast Asia Spain Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Thailand The Pacific Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan UK (United Kingdom) Ukraine USA (America) USSR/Russia Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Europe Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire

Politics

Balkanization Communism Constitutions Democracy Dictators Diplomacy Floism Global Issues Hegemony Homeland Security Human Rights Immigration International Events Law Nationalism NATO Organizations Peace Politics Terrorism United Nations US Elections 2008 US Elections 2012 US Elections 2016 Violence War War Crimes Within the US

Religion

Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Liberation Theology Religion

Science & Technology

Alcohol Anthropology Automotives Biological Weapons Design and Architecture Drugs Energy Environment Internet Landmines Mathematics Medicine Natural Disasters Psychology Recycling Research Science and Humanities Sexuality Space Technology World Wide Web (Internet)

Travel

Geography Maps Tourism Transportation

WAIS

1-TRIBUTES TO PROFESSOR HILTON 2001 Conference on Globalizations Academic WAR Forums Ask WAIS Experts Benefactors Chairman General News Member Information Member Nomination PAIS Research News Ronald Hilton Quotes Seasonal Messages Tributes to Prof. Hilton Varia Various Topics WAIS WAIS 2006 Conference WAIS Board Members WAIS History WAIS Interviews WAIS NEWS waisworld.org launch WAR Forums on Media & Research Who's Who